<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Research Articles</title>
<link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/90</link>
<description>Published Journal Articles from the department.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 22:51:40 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T22:51:40Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>The Role of Schopenhauerian Philosophy of the “Will” And Its Implication for Suicide in Contemporary Society</title>
<link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2707</link>
<description>The Role of Schopenhauerian Philosophy of the “Will” And Its Implication for Suicide in Contemporary Society
Fidelis, O. E.
The moral permissibility of suicide has been striking yet recurrent in its presence as it affects humankind in their daily lives. There have been categories of debates in past and present by philosophers, psychologists, etc. in the bid to decipher if suicide should be seen as immoral action and such condemnable in its practice. Many have fortified the claim that once one has lost the meaning of life due to perplexities, the solution to ease pain is suicide. However, no one especially those who held suicide wrong and problematic, has tried to give a lasting solution from the root of the problem. It is against this backdrop the 19th century philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer conceived the notion of suicide from a different angle though accepting that the decision to commit suicide is impregnated by unbearable and incurable circumstances that makes life’s meaning lost. In his notion, he debunked the arguments of some monotheistic philosophers who held suicide as an immoral act and suicidal persons as cowardice. For him, they have failed to give convincing reasons for calling them so and that the only moral argument against suicide is that it is egoistic and it does not serve the highest moral goal that considers others. He held that suicide is an elusive way of ending suffering, considering that suffering is the result of the Will’s constant striving to live. To end suffering he said, one needs to indulge himself in ‘Aesthetic experience’ and ‘Denial of the will’. Hence, the crux of this work is to understand Schopenhauer’s notion of suicide and his tenet to suffering especially as conceived in his philosophy of the ‘Will’.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2707</guid>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>UBUNTU AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA IN A GLOBAL  COMMUNITY: RETHINKING AFRICAN CONCEPT OF JUSTICE</title>
<link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2706</link>
<description>UBUNTU AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN AFRICA IN A GLOBAL  COMMUNITY: RETHINKING AFRICAN CONCEPT OF JUSTICE
Fidelis, O. E.
Respect  for  human  life  is  the  first  and  end  of  every  human  endeavour. &#13;
Fundamental human rights constitute the hallmark, cornerstone and yardstick &#13;
to measure Humanness. The progress, development and civilization of every &#13;
region,  continent  or  global  community  rested  on  observations,  respect  for &#13;
human rights, dignity and personality. Africa with all its richness in natural &#13;
resources, human resources and minerals resources is the least developed and &#13;
underdeveloped continent in the world. All these are predicated on lack or &#13;
deliberate,  active,  conscious  and  fully  aggressive  infringements  on  the &#13;
fundamental rights of its people. There is an internally motivated wide and &#13;
chronic violations of rights across Africa and this explains why Africans are &#13;
scattered around the globe seeking greener pastures in terms of security, job &#13;
opportunities,  and  decent  living.  The  harsh  treatment  administered  to  the &#13;
Africans makes them become somehow a threat to the global community in the &#13;
sense that most Africans have fashioned different tactics of escaping poverty, &#13;
insecurity, hunger, inhuman treatment and other state-sponsored terrorism to &#13;
other parts of the world through illegal means. To discuss this precarious &#13;
situation, Ubuntu philosophy was rethought therefore, the global community &#13;
through the United Nations and its partners ought to ensure that human &#13;
rights are respected, observed and upheld in every part of Africa this is the only &#13;
way  the  world  and  Africa  in  particular  can  be  at  peace.  We  adopted  the &#13;
analytical method in carrying out our research.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2706</guid>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>How Africa Developed Europe: A Review of Nkwazi Nkuzi Mhango's  deconstructing the HIS-STORY of Africa, Excavating Untold Truth and what ought to be done and Known</title>
<link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2705</link>
<description>How Africa Developed Europe: A Review of Nkwazi Nkuzi Mhango's  deconstructing the HIS-STORY of Africa, Excavating Untold Truth and what ought to be done and Known
Fidelis, O. E
BOOK REVIEW
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2705</guid>
<dc:date>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>RETHINKING RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE IN THE LIGHT OF ASOUZU'S COMPLEMENTARY ONTOLOGY AND THE IDEA OF GOD</title>
<link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2670</link>
<description>RETHINKING RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE IN THE LIGHT OF ASOUZU'S COMPLEMENTARY ONTOLOGY AND THE IDEA OF GOD
Efenji, Joseph Simon
This work addresses the problem of religious intolerance which is borne out of some religious adherent's humanistic tendency to monopolize and canonize the idea of God making Him a private property confined to the limits of their religion only. The authors argue that this selfish and grossly parochial outlook has led to the development of extreme doctrines and practices that have helped in no small measures in fanning the embers of religious violence in our society today. The work decries the divisive, bifurcating polarising and domineering approach employed by some religious adherents to protect their interest. This unintended ethnocentric commitment and ambivalent tension engendered by ihekpuchianya (phenomenon of concealment) is the major cause of almost all the religious conf ids today. This work argues that religious intolerance stifles and closes the mind there by making it non-receptive to other religious views. Thus in a bid to be fanatically theistic, the mind becomes more atheistic. This is because it objectifies God and reduces Him to a property that can be privatized and caged for only a specific religious group. On the contrary, the authors see religion as a unifying factor that binds all humanity together in more cohesive and concrete whole. The authors maintain that the mind will be more receptive and open to welcome other religious views through noetic propaedeutic pedagogy, a rigorous process where the human mind will be purged of every bifurcating and divisive tendency and be educated to think in a humancentric and mutually complimentary way, since to be, according to Asouzu's ontology is to be with others. As an addendum to Asouzu's complementary ontology, the authors make some recommendations for fostering and promoting of religious tolerance in Nigeria nay Africa. The paper employs critical analytical method of reflection to drive home her points.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2670</guid>
<dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
